VISIONS OF LIGHT: THE ART OF CINEMATOGRAPHY

By Roger Ebert

       It is commonplace to observe that a film has good
  cinematography, but far less common to discuss what is meant by that.
  Sometimes all it means is that the pictures are pretty, and for many
  people, I think, "cinematography" somehow connects with vast outdoor
  vistas - the sand dunes in "Lawrence of Arabia," or the Texas plains
  in "Days of Heaven." But great cinematography can also consist of the
  look in an eye, the tense space between two people, or the shadows in
  the corner of a cramped room.
           "Visions of Light," which has been booked into the Music Box
  to celebrate the theater's 10th anniversary as Chicago's shrine of
  art and repertory cinema, is a documentary that will likely cause
  everyone who sees it to look at movies a little differently in the
  future. It is a film about cinematography, consisting of a great many
  great shots and sequences, commented on by the men (and a few women)
  who photographed them.
       The only way to criticize a movie, JeanLuc Godard famously said,
  is to make another movie. Certainly the best way to criticize
  cinematography is to show it. Here we begin with some of the earliest
  shots in which the artistry of motion picture photography began to
  pull away from the mere fact that it could record light and movement
  on film.
       At the very first, of course, filmmakers simply pointed their
  cameras at things, and then audiences gasped when they could see
  them. But then the lure of style began to seduce them.
  Cinematographers such as Billy Bitzer, working with D. W. Griffith,
  began to move the camera in for closeups, and intercut shots to
  create an emotional rhythm, and move the camera itself - and soon
  cinematography was born.
       In Britain, the cinematographer was originally known as the
  "lighting cameraman," and indeed light - the way it falls on the
  subject, the way it is present or absent - is at the heart of the
  craft. I remember the late James Wong Howe telling an audience at the
  Chicago Film Festival how he battled with the technical advisers from
  Technicolor when he was shooting "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer,"
  which was only the third or fourth film made in the process. They
  advised him to pour on light, lots of it, even in the scene where Tom
  and Becky are lost in the cave. He cut the light by threequarters,
  and made the scene feel real. They complained that you couldn't even
  see most of the cave. Exactly.
       In "Visions of Light," many great cinematographers talk about
  their relationships with directors, with shots, and with the light.
  It is always hard to say exactly where a director's contribution ends
  and the cinematographer's begins, but it is always true that it's the
  cinematographer's responsibility to realize the director's vision -
  and sometimes, they hint here, to supply it.
       Sometimes their skill consists merely of taking advantage of a
  happy chance. One of the most beautiful and effective shots shown in
  this film is from Richard Brooks' "In Cold Blood," photographed by
  Conrad Hall in 1967. On the night he is to be hanged from the
  gallows, the murderer played by Robert Blake looks out through a
  window peppered with rain. Looking through his viewfinder, Hall
  discovered that the light through the window caught the shadows of
  raindrops as they trickled down the glass, and projected them against
  Blake's face, creating the illusion of ghostly tears. "He told me not
  to move, and not to cry," Blake remembered. The shot cries for him.
       There are many other shots here, from Gregg Toland's deep focus
  work in "Citizen Kane" through to Haskell Wexler's work on "Who's
  Afraid of Virginia Woolf," which might have been retitled by Richard
  Burton and Elizabeth Taylor, "Who's Afraid of Haskell Wexler," since
  they let him photograph them with a distinctly unflattering realism,
  and the shots so suited the mood of the piece that it became one of
  their great collaborations.
       Faithful readers will not be surprised to learn that the black
  and white cinematography, of course, is more beautiful than the
  color. Black and white, I believe, contains the naked soul of the
  cinema. Color photography merely supplies its clothes. In a segment
  devoted to Stanley Cortez's great cinematography on Charles
  Laughton's  "The Night of the Hunter" (1955), the younger
  cinematographer Allen Daviau talks about the reluctance with which
  the great cameramen left B&W, with its greater poetry and mystery,
  for the prosaic reality of color. Certainly the shot shown from the
  film - Lillian Gish sitting grimly on a porch with a rifle, while
  Robert Mitchum loiters on a sidewalk - recalls the film's almost
  surrealistic sense of horror. There is another shot in the film where
  Mitchum's shadow from a street lamp is cast, stark and terrifying, on
  a child's bedroom ceiling. The whole style bespeaks B&W.
       The cinematographers quoted here all speak of the greater
  difficulty of lighting black and white, but of its greater rewards.
  Of all of the crimes that television has committed against the
  movies, its lamebrained enforcement of the color rule is the worst.
  It came about because in the late 1960s, when most people began to
  have color sets, it was naively believed that they wanted to see only
  color movies on television. As anyone who has ever watched "It's a
  Wonderful Life" or "Casablanca" on TV can testify, B&W actually looks
  better on TV than color does. (The first network to return to B&W
  footage in a newscast will be surprised to find that its ratings
  jump.)
       "Visions of Light" is the kind of movie that will affect the way
  you look at movies. It calls your attention to what is being shown on
  the screen, when you are perhaps more used to following what is
  happening in the story.
       Look, here, at a scene from "Rosemary's Baby." The character
  played by Ruth Gordon is seen at the end of a corridor, on the
  telephone. Cinematographer William Fraker remembers that the
  director, Roman Polanski, asked him to move the camera so that
  audiences could see only Gordon's back; the rest of her body was
  concealed by a door. So sinister was the call and so great the
  audience's curiosity, Fraker remembers, that when the shot played,
  everyone in the theater unconsciously shifted to one side, trying to
  see around that door.


  VISIONS OF LIGHT:
   THE ART OF CINEMATOGRAPHY
   (STAR) (STAR) (STAR)  1/2
   A documentary directed by Arnold Glassman, Todd McCarthy and Stuart
  Samuels. Written by McCarthy.  Running Time: 90 minutes. Opens today
  at the Music Box, 3733 N. Southport.


back to course notes